OXHN ADVISORS

AI advisory for professional-services firms

AI, grounded
in the work.

Less time assembling the work.
More attention to the decisions.

We help owners and operations leaders assess and build AI workflows for document review, report preparation and internal handoffs—especially in firms serving government and complex enterprise clients. Start with one recurring task, a clear owner and a test of whether AI actually helps.

Discuss one workflow Explore the servicesSee a worked example

Business purpose first.

Technical judgment throughout.

Real-world constraints included.

The opportunity

Where does the
work get stuck?

A proposal team checking a long brief. A project lead assembling a report. An operations manager chasing an incomplete handoff. Start with the repeated step—not a company-wide AI rollout.

Illustrative workflows / Not client results

Requirements → Review list
Turn a brief into a draft list of requirements linked to their source passages. A reviewer checks omissions and ambiguity before the team relies on it.
See the source-linked example →Fictional inputs. Human review shown.
Source material → Report draft
Assemble a first draft from approved project information. The responsible professional verifies the sources, conclusions and final wording.
Intake → Clear handoff
Identify missing information and prepare the next step for the right owner. Keep approval and exception handling explicit.

01 / Where we can help

A clear next step.
Not another AI initiative.

You don’t need to have the answer before you start. You do need a question worth working on.

01

Find the right opportunity

AI opportunity sprint

Choose whether to improve the process, configure an existing tool or test a focused AI workflow.

You leave with a workflow map, an options comparison and a written next-step recommendation—even if that recommendation is not to build.

Scope and preparation

We examine the current steps, source material, review effort and operating constraints. Together we define what better would mean and what evidence would justify a pilot. Bring the process owner and a recent example you can discuss.

Decide
02

Test before you scale

Focused workflow pilot

Test one recurring task before committing to a broader rollout.

You leave with a bounded pilot, evaluation findings and a go, revise or stop recommendation.

Scope and preparation

We compare existing tools with targeted configuration or custom work, agree on representative examples, and examine quality, review effort and failure cases. An operating guide names the reviewer, exception path and owner. Scope, access and evaluation criteria are agreed before building.

Test
03

Make the change workable

Adoption & operating guidance

Make an existing workflow understandable to the people responsible for it.

You leave with a team walkthrough, review and ownership rules, and a prioritized improvement list.

Scope and preparation

We work through the ordinary cases and the exceptions: who checks an output, who approves its use, what to do when it fails and who maintains the workflow. Bring the current process and the decisions blocking adoption.

Adopt

02 / Our perspective

A builder’s perspective.
An understanding of government.

Can this work with the systems you already use?

OXHN Advisors draws on a background in building software companies and navigating government. That combination shapes the questions we ask: Who needs to review and approve it? Who will maintain it once the pilot ends?

We connect technical choices to the way work actually moves through an organization.

An existing tool, a simpler process or a decision not to proceed can be the right answer.

A working principle

Start with the work.
Earn the case for the technology.

03 / How we work

Move with intention.

A focused engagement begins with an explicit question and ends with something your team can use.

  1. 01 / Frame

    Make the problem clear.

    Agree on the objective, stakeholders, constraints, and the decision this work needs to inform.

  2. 02 / Examine

    Work through the evidence.

    Look at the actual workflow. Test assumptions about data, technology, economics, and adoption.

  3. 03 / Commit

    Define the next move.

    Document the recommendation, tradeoffs, responsibilities, and conditions for moving forward.

A useful starting point

You have a recurring task, someone who owns it and examples that can be evaluated. You want to understand the tradeoffs before making a larger commitment. If the process is unclear or an existing tool already fits, that is where we start.

Practical resources / No signup required

Is this workflow worth an AI pilot?

Map one task, separate evidence from assumptions, and compare a process fix, existing tools and a bounded pilot. A practical worksheet—not a maturity score.

Open the worksheet

Print it or copy it into your own document. No score. No assumed savings. A clearer next decision.

Synthetic worked example / Not client results

What does a reviewable output look like?

Follow a fictional brief into a source-linked requirements list. See the missing inputs, a conflicting instruction and the decision that stays with a person.

Open the worked example

Full source pack, review trail and illustrative economics.

04 / Start a conversation

Bring one workflow.
Start there.

Email vartan@oxhn.com with what your team does, the recurring task you want to improve and where it gets stuck. No polished brief required. Please leave sensitive client information out of the first message.

Email about a workflow

vartan@oxhn.com · Opens your email application. Please don’t send confidential information.